Skip to Content
Call Us Today! 213-798-4854
Top
Prenuptial Agreement

Los Angeles Prenuptial Agreement Attorney

Supporting Clients Every Step of the Way

What is a Prenuptial Agreement?

In the absence of a premarital agreement, the general community property presumption under California family code section 760 controls which provides “ ….all property, real or personal, wherever situated, acquired by a married person during the marriage while domiciled in this state is community property.”  Family Code §760.    This becomes a problem if you are the spouse that has the substantially higher income or the one who accumulates the majority of the assets during the marriage.  You are called in family law lingo “the in spouse.”  The other spouse (or in our lingo also called the “out spouse” gets a half interest on everything accumulated during the marriage even if the asset is under your name alone or it was accumulated solely due to your sweat and hard work.  The out spouse, who stayed at home most of the marriage, gets a one half interest on all the accumulations during the marriage under California community property law.  For example, if you opened a savings account during the marriage under your name alone for which you religiously and diligently stash away 25% of your earnings during the marriage while your spouse blows away his/her salary during the marriage, your spouse still gets a half interest in the money you saved in your savings account.  Another example would be if you purchase a piece of real property during the marriage under “your name alone” and have your spouse sign a “quit claim” deed, your spouse may still have a claim for a half interest in your real property. Another example would be if you owned a business prior to marriage, but due to your hard work, long hours of labor, and efforts, the business grew exponentially during the marriage, your spouse may still have a claim for an interest in the business.

Contact the Law Offices of Kenneth U. Reyes, APC to schedule a consultation with one of our knowledgeable Los Angeles Prenuptial Attorneys!

Should I Get A Prenuptial Agreement?

 Signing a premarital agreement may serve as added protection to the future “in spouse” and a hurdle for the future “out spouse” by avoiding or altering the applicability of California community property law to assets 1)  already owned by each and 2) to property and income to be acquired or earned during their marriage. Marriage of Dawley (1976) 17 C3d 342, 349, 131 CR 3, 7; Marriage of Grinius (1985) 166 CA3d 1179, 1186, 212 CR 803, 807  Premarital agreements may validly provide that the earnings and accumulations of each party during marriage will remain that party's separate property, free of any claims, community property or otherwise, of the other party.Marriage of Dawley, supra, 17 C3d at 350, 131 CR at 8; Cheney v. City & County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System (1936) 7 C2d 565, 569, 61 P2d 754, 756.  Premarital agreements may also serve to preserve a person’s estate for his or her heirs, free of the other party's inheritance claims. Estate of Wamack (1955) 137 CA2d 112, 115, 289 P2d 871, 872

 Pursuant to Family Code §1612(c ),“ Parties to a premarital agreement may contract with respect to all of the following:(1) The rights and obligations of each of the parties in any of the property of either or both of them whenever and wherever acquired or located. (2) The right to buy, sell, use, transfer, exchange, abandon, lease, consume, expend, assign, create a security interest in, mortgage, encumber, dispose of, or otherwise manage and control property.(3) The disposition of property upon separation, marital dissolution, death, or the occurrence or nonoccurrence of any other event.(4) The making of a will, trust, or other arrangement to carry out the provisions of the agreement.(5) The ownership rights in and disposition of the death benefit from a life insurance policy.(6) The choice of law governing the construction of the agreement.(7) Any other matter, including their personal rights and obligations, not in violation of public policy or a statute imposing a criminal penalty.  However, the right of a child to support may not be adversely affected. Family Code §1612(b).

Premarital agreements that are entered into voluntarily by parties who are each represented by independent counsel and aware of the effect of the agreement, a post 1985 premarital waiver of post dissolution support does not offend contemporary public policy and is not per se unenforceable. Fam.C. § 1612(c); Marriage of Pendleton & Fireman (2000) 24 C4th 39, 53–54, 99 CR2d 278, 288–289; Marriage of Facter (2013) 212 CA4th 967, 981, 152 CR3d 79, 90.

 Under both the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act and prior law, the spouse claiming the agreement is invalid or not enforceable bears the burden of proof on that allegation. Family Code. § 1615(a); Marriage of Bonds, supra, 24 C4th at 27, 99 CR2d at 269; Marriage of Iverson (1992) 11 CA4th 1495, 1502, 15 CR2d 70, 74–75; However, the UPAA (as amended effective 1/1/02) deems that a premarital agreement was not executed voluntarily unless the court makes five prescribed findings provided for under Family Code. § 1615(c) 

 (1) The party against whom enforcement is sought was represented by independent legal counsel at the time of signing the agreement or, after being advised to seek independent legal counsel, expressly waived, in a separate writing, representation by independent legal counsel. The advisement to seek independent legal counsel shall be made at least seven calendar days before the final agreement is signed.

(2) One of the following:

(A) For an agreement executed between January 1, 2002, and January 1, 2020, the party against whom enforcement is sought had not less than seven calendar days between the time that party was first presented with the final agreement and advised to seek independent legal counsel and the time the agreement was signed. This requirement does not apply to nonsubstantive amendments that do not change the terms of the agreement.

(B) For an agreement executed on or after January 1, 2020, the party against whom enforcement is sought had not less than seven calendar days between the time that party was first presented with the final agreement and the time the agreement was signed, regardless of whether the party is represented by legal counsel. This requirement does not apply to nonsubstantive amendments that do not change the terms of the agreement.

(3) The party against whom enforcement is sought, if unrepresented by legal counsel, was fully informed of the terms and basic effect of the agreement as well as the rights and obligations the party was giving up by signing the agreement, and was proficient in the language in which the explanation of the party’s rights was conducted and in which the agreement was written. The explanation of the rights and obligations relinquished shall be memorialized in writing and delivered to the party prior to signing the agreement. The unrepresented party shall, on or before the signing of the premarital agreement, execute a document declaring that the party received the information required by this paragraph and indicating who provided that information.

(4) The agreement and the writings executed pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (3) were not executed under duress, fraud, or undue influence, and the parties did not lack capacity to enter into the agreement.

(5) Any other factors the court deems relevant.

 A premarital agreement may be unenforceable if found to be unconscionable when it was executed and the requisite disclosures were lacking and not waived Additionally, a spousal support provision in a premarital agreement executed under the UPAA, whether before or after January 1, 2002, is not enforceable if found to be unconscionable at the time of enforcement. Family Code § 1612(c).  

If you are the higher earning spouse and have assets to protect, it is important to seek the representation of experienced counsel in drafting a premarital agreement to make sure that all statutory requirement are met which increases the likelihood that your premarital agreement will be deemed enforceable when attacked in court in case of a divorce.

Contact the Law Offices of Kenneth U. Reyes, APC to schedule a consultation with one of our knowledgeable Los Angeles Prenuptial Attorneys!

  • “To Kenneth, Fe and the entire team. Thank you so much....”
    “To Kenneth, Fe and the entire team. Thank you so much....”
    G.P.
  • “level-headed and professional”
    Thank you to Ken Reyes and his colleague Gabriella Castro for their exceptional service, hard work and unwavering dedication to my case. Divorce settlements are never easy or clear cut and both Ken and Gabriella spent time to explain every detail and remained strong, level-headed and professional during the heated back and forth with the opposing law firm. I was very satisfied with the overall outcome of my case and highly recommend Ken and team for all legal issues. Thank you Ken. Keep up the great work and I look forward to working with you again in the future.
    J.C.
  • “Consultation is answered swiftly (same day inquiry and feedback), provides assistance in every step of the way, application is processed promptly.”
    “Consultation is answered swiftly (same day inquiry and feedback), provides assistance in every step of the way, application is processed promptly.”
    L.M.
  • “Lended a hand when I needed it most.”
    A divorce or separation is the hardest thing a family can go through. I was terrified for my children and felt lost and scared. Thankfully, I found the Law Offices of Kenneth U. Reyes, APC. The staff made me feel comfortable and clarified all my questions about separation and custody. They represented me well in court and worked with my budget. Forever thankful for their support.
    J.M.
  • “No words to say but a big "Thank You" for all the help and confidence you gave me.”
    “No words to say but a big "Thank You" for all the help and confidence you gave me.”
    O.F.
  • “He also worked with my budget since I was on my own and had no financial support from anyone I only counted with my income.”
    “He also worked with my budget since I was on my own and had no financial support from anyone I only counted with my income.”
    J.M.
  • “Exceptional service, hard work, dedication”
    Thank you to the Law Offices of Kenneth U. Reyes, APC, for their exceptional service, hard work, and unwavering dedication to my case. Their team explained every detail and remained professional throughout heated negotiations. Highly recommend for all legal issues.
    J.C.
  • “He and his staff had guided us from the start until the time that we had an interview and finally got an approval on my petition for green card.”
    “He and his staff had guided us from the start until the time that we had an interview and finally got an approval on my petition for green card.”
    J.B.

Contact Us Today!

We’re Ready to Help

A member of our team will be in touch shortly to confirm your contact details or address questions you may have.

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy

WHY CHOOSE OUR FIRm?

  • Fluent in English, Filipino, Mandarin, Vietnamese, and Spanish
  • Highly Involved in the Filipino Community
  • Regularly Published Legal Professional
  • Award-Winning Certified Public Accountant
  • Over 25 Years of Legal Experience
  • Board-Certified Family Law Specialist
Our Location
3699 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 747
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Map + Directions